۲۴/فروردین/۹۲, ۸:۰۰
دوستان دقت کنید که سایت ویکیپدیا یکسری قوانین و مقررات داره و اگر قوانین آن مراعات شود مشکلی نخواهد بود.
در همین صفحه دلیل خذف صفحه ذکر شده است که استاندارد G11 رعایت نشده است.
متن استاندارد G11 بصورت زیر است:
G11. Unambiguous
advertising or promotion.Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic.
Note:
An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. "Promotion" does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organisation, a point of view, etc. See
WP:NOTFORPROMOTION
for the policy on this.
دلیل اصلی متن بالا است. که خلاصه اش این است که مطالب ویکی پدیا نباید بصورت تبلیغات بازرگانی باشند و باید از یک دیدگاه بیطرفانه به معرفی شخص بپردازند که متناسب با روال دانشنامه ای باشد.
در انتها گفته که برای توضیحات بیشتر آدرس WP:NOTFORPROMOTION مراجعه کنید.
Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion
olicies_and_guidelines">Policy
shortcuts:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas.[align=START]Wikipedia is not a
soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to articles, categories, templates, talk page discussions, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted in Wikipedia is not for:[align=START]
promoting things "heard through the grapevine" or gossiping. Articles and content
about living people
are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be
libellous
or infringe the subjects' right to
privacy. Articles should not be written purely to
attackthe reputation of another person.Self-promotion.
It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, do remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which can be difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources is unacceptable. See
Wikipedia:Autobiography,Wikipedia:Notability
and
lict_of_interest">Wikipedia![[تصویر: confused.png]](http://forum.bidari-andishe.ir/images/smilies/confused.png)
lict of interest.
[b]Advertising.
Information about companies and products must be written in an
objective and unbiased style, free of
puffery. All article topics must be
verifiable
withindependent,
third-party sources, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable.
External links
to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify
notable
organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See alsoWikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)
for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing
public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so.
[align=START]Non-disruptive statements of opinion on internal Wikipedia policies and guidelines may be made on user pages and within the Wikipedia: namespace, as they are relevant to the current and future operation of the project.
متاسفانه ما یک گروه تخصصی برای ویکی پدیا درست نکرده ایم که قوانین و مقرارت ویکی پدیا را کاملا مطالعه کنن و ترجمه کنند و بصورت مدیریت شده و سازمان یافته مطالب جهت آن تهیه و در این سایت بارگذاری شوند. ما زیادی هم نباید از استکبار بترسیم و فکر کنیم هر اتفاقی میفته زیر سر آنهاست. خیلی وقتها مشکلات به دلیل بی سوادی خود ماست.
در ضمن در ویکی پدیا کاربرانی که امتیاز مشارکت بیشتری دارند اختیار بیشتری در تصمیم گیری های این سایت دارند و رای آنها در مورد مطالب مثلا حذف یا عدم خذف یک مطلب امتیاز بیشتری دارد.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Akbar_Raefipour
در همین صفحه دلیل خذف صفحه ذکر شده است که استاندارد G11 رعایت نشده است.
متن استاندارد G11 بصورت زیر است:
G11. Unambiguous
advertising or promotion.Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic.
Note:
An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. "Promotion" does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organisation, a point of view, etc. See
WP:NOTFORPROMOTION
for the policy on this.
دلیل اصلی متن بالا است. که خلاصه اش این است که مطالب ویکی پدیا نباید بصورت تبلیغات بازرگانی باشند و باید از یک دیدگاه بیطرفانه به معرفی شخص بپردازند که متناسب با روال دانشنامه ای باشد.
در انتها گفته که برای توضیحات بیشتر آدرس WP:NOTFORPROMOTION مراجعه کنید.
Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion
olicies_and_guidelines">Policy
shortcuts:
- WP:NOTADVERTISING
- WP:NOTADVOCATE
- WP:NOTGOSSIP
- WP:NOTOPINION
- WP:NOTSCANDAL
- WP:NOTSOAPBOX
- WP:NOTPROMOTION
- ROMOTION">WP
![[تصویر: tongue.png]](http://forum.bidari-andishe.ir/images/smilies/tongue.png)
ROMOTION - WP:SOAP
- WP:SOAPBOX
Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas.[align=START]Wikipedia is not a
soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to articles, categories, templates, talk page discussions, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted in Wikipedia is not for:[align=START]
- Advocacy,
propaganda, or
recruitment
of any kind: commercial, political, religious, national, sports-related, or otherwise. An article can report objectively
about
such things, as long as an attempt is made to describe the topic from a
neutral point of view. You might wish to start a
blog
or visit a
forum
if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views.[sup]
[
2
]
[/sup] - Opinion pieces.
Although some topics, particularly those concerning current affairs and politics, may stir passions and tempt people to "climbsoapboxes" (for example, passionately advocate their pet point of view), Wikipedia is not the medium for this. Articles must be balanced to put entries, especially for
current events, in a reasonable perspective, and represent a
neutral point of view. Furthermore, Wikipedia authors should strive to write articles that will not quickly become obsolete. However, Wikipedia's sister project
Wikinews
allows commentaries on its articles. - [b]Scandal mongering,
promoting things "heard through the grapevine" or gossiping. Articles and content
about living people
are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be
libellous
or infringe the subjects' right to
privacy. Articles should not be written purely to
attackthe reputation of another person.
It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, do remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which can be difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources is unacceptable. See
Wikipedia:Autobiography,Wikipedia:Notability
and
lict_of_interest">Wikipedia
lict of interest.Information about companies and products must be written in an
objective and unbiased style, free of
puffery. All article topics must be
verifiable
withindependent,
third-party sources, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable.
External links
to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify
notable
organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See alsoWikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)
for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing
public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so.
متاسفانه ما یک گروه تخصصی برای ویکی پدیا درست نکرده ایم که قوانین و مقرارت ویکی پدیا را کاملا مطالعه کنن و ترجمه کنند و بصورت مدیریت شده و سازمان یافته مطالب جهت آن تهیه و در این سایت بارگذاری شوند. ما زیادی هم نباید از استکبار بترسیم و فکر کنیم هر اتفاقی میفته زیر سر آنهاست. خیلی وقتها مشکلات به دلیل بی سوادی خود ماست.
در ضمن در ویکی پدیا کاربرانی که امتیاز مشارکت بیشتری دارند اختیار بیشتری در تصمیم گیری های این سایت دارند و رای آنها در مورد مطالب مثلا حذف یا عدم خذف یک مطلب امتیاز بیشتری دارد.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Akbar_Raefipour
